Communitarianism.

I think what should be clearly open for debate is how much the individual is directly responsible, you know? Are we content with just allowing this thing to escalate?

Or, if you except that what the human body emits should be limited, where does one draw the line in terms of legislation? We breathe OUT Carbon Dioxide.

Would you, for example, be happy at surveillance (we got more than China, remember) being used to see if people aren't recycling? Or if they are trading Carbon Credits that aren't theirs to trade? Or maybe it’s just fine to see if people are applying for the “wrong” schools in this post-democratic federation.

Significant portions of the global agenda is tied up with the entire scam; e.g. The Optimum Population Trust. The UN views China as a model state. I'm sure from their point of view, looking down, it is. They would like that kind of mindset to be fully accepted here (Europe). Oh and guess what - you can use the Carbon Emission Incentive in this instance as well... bloody babies, polluting the air!

There was a time when Carbon wasn't even considered a pollutant. I'm not saying fighting for the environment isn't necessarily a just cause; I’m just curious as to why we look at the business men and global elite to assume such responsibilities. Too much rests on it as far as what they have lined up, so the Copenhagen is a done deal, at least the economic side anyway - 6 months ago.

In reference to the “Climate Gate”… a little quote from the main scientist involved

“My colleagues and I accept that some of the published emails do not read well." – Phillip Jones.