Why do we continue to offer this nation’s young men and woman as sacrifice? The debate about the war has disappeared from the eye of the mainstream. The fact it’s an illegal war, which a large proportion of the population could not get behind when it broke out, matters not. It’s being played out like any good war propaganda film – the battle goes on so long that the people forget why it started. War is peace and all that, and who’s funding it?
Just like the UN’s “Peace Keeping Force”. A super police force that supersedes the nation states, to protect the interests of (wait for it) not country, but a Corpration. That’s what the UN is; a legal entity. If you think this sounds too wild, bare in mind the following: the EU, with the aid of the Lisbon treaty, conned the Irish and the Czech people into voting (twice, to get the right answer) essentially giving this super-state “legal” status as EU. This has huge regulatory and economic implications. This is far beyond the comprehension of most of the public; we’re lead to believe this is the only natural solution (i.e. the persistent consolidation of power – but with the same names and shadow government orchestrating the moves). The chess players never sit on the chess board.
“The mandate of United Nations Police is different in each mission. In some missions, the mandate has been limited to monitoring the local police services. In more complex missions, the mandate includes advising, training, helping establish local police services and enhancing their work, and, in some cases, law enforcement. This complexity is compounded by the need to integrate all components of the criminal justice system to ensure comprehensive and sustainable rule of law.” – Official U.N Website
The aforementioned integration comes in the form of a partnership between a private body of international data, known as Interpol, and the man power of the U.N. Ultimately to fulfil what the representatives call “a visionary model”. A global police force. Imagine the scenario; the UN throwing accusations at you and your family for being anti-social global citizens – you didn’t recycle for a whole year, you produce too much waste and what’s more – you carelessly didn’t unplug your electrical applications when you went on holiday! Which by the way, you used your friends carbon credit-card because you’d used yours visiting family earlier in the year. Oh by the way the footage was recorded by your fellow citizens, are you calling them liars? [citation needed… okay here you go]
“Despite popular misconception, the organization maintains no police force of its own. Each member nation maintains and staffs a National Central Bureau to direct Interpol intelligence, while local authorities investigate and prosecute criminals according to national laws” – from wikipedia or something.
And how do you transcend national laws? The U.N, that’s how.
“The police will be trained and equipped differently with resources… when they stop someone, they will be consulting global databases to determine who they are stopping.” Ross Noble [ Interpol and U.N. Back ‘Global Policing Doctrine ]
It’s too late for the concept that “they could never do that”. The fact is they’re doing it, incrementally, Fabian-style, to bring order out of chaos. They are never satisfied. The old Masonic doctrine, the ones the big boys know all about; out of many, one. UN is one is French. One world. You hear that frequently in the Eco friendly type adverts (“raising public awareness”, that means the money pumped into these NGO campaign’s has a specific purpose – to make you believe).
E Pluribus Unum — "Out of Many, One."
Make believe. Carbon taxing (World Economy), global warming (Global Governance), terrorism (Step this way, please), swine flu (World Health Organisation). A good set of myths to keep the public in a state of fear (perpetual war) while chasing their own tale, looking for the answers. All the while, allowing those who write the script to pass whatever laws they want.
EDF for example – the let it be known, we do not vote for these companies who act as “lobby groups”. They are presented to the public as a voice of the people. Notice the Alphabet soup names as well (Environmental Defense Fund). They are generally stuck in a perpetual state of demanding that certain laws be put through parliament – all for the greater good and virtuous causes they support. All good and well. Not so when you realise these are primarily (especially, unsurprisingly the ones mandated by the U.N) set up in the first instance by huge international bankers.
They act as a smoke screen for things like Carbon Taxing. You’d be forgiven for thinking the U.N isn’t behind that. They’re incredibly behind it, like a full blown assault on what the human body produces (we breathe out carbon). The ideal world citizen has to be “producer/consumer”, according to the U.N’s utopian doctrines. This means if you aren’t working (lets say you’re too old or have a disability), you’re just consuming and therefore it equates that you are a useless consumer (a burden on the world, no less!). And who are these people who will make such decisions? Well thanks largely to mass media all being on board or too damn ignorant, most of us aren’t too savvy with any of the faces behind the new geopolitical structure which is being hurried into shape. By that I mean they want us to want what they have planned for us, without really being aware of the implications.
EDF has a section of their website – facts and myths about Global Warming. Just so happens it’s almost identical to the Royal Society’s. Even if it is all true, and they successfully manage to kibosh any scepticism you may have, is it still just a co-incidence that all this one sided propaganda is forcing us into a corner. “Too late for talk, we must act” – that’s often been the mantra of radical environmentalists, now it’s mainstream and has unquantifiable financial backing. What does that mean for us?
E.U, on the other hand, is rumoured to feature (as president, no less) the man responsible for passing Britain’s anti-terror laws. Along with running the country right into the pockets of the internationalists and shit-hound bankers, his Fabian inspired “New Labour” was lost on most of us. He represents the working man, with five houses. Exit stage left, Tony Blair. Re-surface a few years later on the world stage leaving ol’ mouth breather Golden Brown to face the music. so we now know he didn't get the position, we got Herman Van Rompuy. (who? Exactley.)
Van Rompuy related to global governance by stating: "2009 is also the first year of global governance with the establishment of the G20 in the middle of a financial crisis; the climate conference in Copenhagen is another step towards the global management of our planet." Van Rompuy referred to the United Nations Climate Change Conference 2009. No shit, we're all on board! NWO bound.
It’s a clever empire they’re building – history repeats it’s self but because we’re too in the thick of it, it’s hard for us to state it openly – without coming across as one of them “conspiracy nuts”*. But of course – the Club of Rome talked about this years ago – a world run by experts. It didn’t matter if these experts didn’t have anything resembling a human soul – they’re the scientists on the payroll, so we should listen to them alone.
Look at the propaganda machine that is Hollywood (Holy-Wood, the magicians wand) did you realise that the Pentagon funds the majority of war movies? Here’s the deal – we’ll give you the most intense looking modern weapons and technologies to use in your movie, you can then manipulate them with enhancing graphics (Iron Man, for example). But the catch is; we (the U.S Military, or rather, the money behind) get the final word on the script. That is an example of war propaganda. I don't know how clear it could be.
I think, deep down, we know that there is a lot wrong (you could say soulless) with these megalithic brainwash tactics, but we can justify it all with some token Freudian psychology and say “hey, it’s just appealing to human’s violent nature”. Right, yeah. Or it’s convincing us that the power structure already in place has your best interests at heart, and there’s experts taking care of it. The sad fact is, the people pulling the strings have a deeper understanding of psychology as a powerful a tool for social control then they let on.
All the big Sci-Fi writers are aware of this element to their “fiction”. HG Wells, Aldous Huxley - big believers is a scientific based dictatorship. Look into them for yourselves.
That’s why they train us to get used to ideas; it’s called predictive programming. All sounds far out, I know, but then why go through the hassle of having all the best “experts” in these fields on the payroll?
It is often futile to comprehensively rationalise how geo-politics works, because these people use any excuse under the sun to justify what they have done, and will do. Power is non-negotiable. It doesn’t matter if we have any interest in the occult, the fact is they do – what’s more they rub it in our faces to prove the point. I believe there are very ancient religions behind these ideas of a new world order – nothing like what we can learn about without a fair amount of studying and proper reading. The out right denial of any occult origins, combined with inconsistent, convenient explanations from official sources, speak volumes. Those with eyes to see and ears to hear will understand what I’m referring to, but for now I’ll stick with the current agenda.
Remember seeing sci-fi films which feature (albeit, antiquated in appearance, but Gattaca springs to mind) biometric systems, which have everyone’s data on them? Do you genuinely think this has anything to do with stopping crime? Sure it will make reductions here and there. But in actuality, its preliminary objective is concerned with knowing your every move. They already have a lot of this data, and the new UN police force will also have access to this data. Predictability within society has always been one of the key aims at the top of the pyramid, and Sci-Fi has been used for years as method of predictive programming. That’s why the RFID chip is receiving minimal airplay with maximum $ to aid the research (IBM on board- I’ve heard they’ll lend you some brass if it aids the NWO…)
If there has ever been an era more defined by governments us selling out, it’s probably now. But we’ve been sold a culture of irony, schizophrenic nonsense, a culture that’s taught us “Hey, history does repeat it’s self and that’s just the way it is...”
After the decision to send more British troops to aid the occupation of Iraq, the BBC news reporter posed the question to the military representative:
“Wouldn’t we have saved more British troops if we had made the decision to send them to Iraq earlier?”
Now this kind of statement craftily leads you down one path: the troops are going; all that’s left to discuss is should we have sent them earlier?! Do they have enough weapons?!
For a start, as much as it is an inconvenience, these are people, (souls, if you will) not just troops. So sending them earlier would have saved them, I understand now!
So extending their time in the line of fire - would have saved more lives. War is peace!
It’s clear that we, the public, have very little say on these kinds of matters concerning the vast military-industrial complex – even more so once the ball is rolling. We’re treated as too silly, emotional, and irrational to have a proper opinion. That said, I find it even more insulting when they suggest that sending more troops, by the act of a miracle, saves more lives. It’s possible to argue this case; but you’d be staring into a bottomless pit of philosophical double-think
More soldiers; more British men and woman coming home in body bags. More mothers loosing children
And for what? No body can answer me that.
NB:
*(But that’s how disinformation works – you take a genuine, good idea, with integrity, and shit right in the middle of it and lead people into some kind of new age phoney make believe. A lot of these people are paid to do just that – whether they’re aware of it or not – more on that later)
No comments:
Post a Comment