"You must all know half a dozen people at least who are no use in this world, who are more trouble than they are worth. Just put them there and say Sir, or Madam, now will you be kind enough to justify your existence? If you can’t justify your existence, if you’re not pulling your weight in the social boat, if you’re not producing as much as you consume or perhaps a little more, then, clearly, we cannot use the organizations of our society for the purpose of keeping you alive, because your life does not benefit us and it can’t be of very much use to yourself." George Bernard Shaw, British Fabian.
Wow, people are gunna love socialism. This particular brand of elitism is so easily veiled as being for the benefit of an ill-conceived (and vaguely defined) greater good, it’s hard for the public to extract much truth. That is of course, any truth to which the authorities do not consider necessary or desirable. The danger here is that this world view, particular to those in an already established position within “civil society” (cradle to grave), leads to ultimately tyranny. They will have to go along with it because livelihoods will be at stake. That is how you control a society. This is what progress means to the elite. In the face of such ideals, we should be reminded that Socialism was the doctrine of both the Nazi’s and the Bolsheviks. Both of which justified mass murder.
H.G Wells downplays the impact that the radio rendition of “The War of the Worlds, put action by Orson Wells, had on the American public in 1930’s
Huxley makes reference to “Techniques” which would be more prevalent in controlling populations in the future. I.e. mass entertainment, mass media, Tell-Lie-Vision, etc.
Wednesday 10 March 2010
Divide et impera
"It seems to me that the nature of the ultimate revolution with which we are now faced is precisely this: That we are in process of developing a whole series of techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy who have always existed and presumably will always exist to get people to love their servitude."
- Aldous Huxley
There’s no need for conspiracy theories when their own writings and words speak volumes. Yet most "lefties" are conditioned to think that they are kicking against the system, not realizing than we're actually moving into a feudal type capitalist system, which has been blended with the communist system of strong governance. They call it commutarianism, the 3rd way (the whole public-private partnership in the U.K being a good example of this.)
Global warming or climate change are some of their primary techniques of changing society - decided on thanks to the Club of Rome, who were given the specific task of dreaming up a scenario which could be used to unite the world.
"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill ... All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."
- Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution, consultants to the UN
CoR are an off shoot off, a specific arm of the One World Government, agenda. Well connected with all the usual “conspiracy” buzzwords like the Bilderburgs, Council of Foreign Relations, etc. And yes, it is an agenda. I think the whole branding of "conspiracy theory" is a kin to the communists who called everything "bourgeoisie" when it didn't fit their agenda. Or the right wing who branded everything under the sun "communist" while failing to realize that the big (tax except) foundations in Amerika were funding what appeared to be left-wing groups - in order to lay the ground work to merge the U.S with the Soviet system ('rule by council'). Please check out the Reece Committee.
Here is an interview 1982 by G. Edward Griffin regarding the time he spent as the head researcher for the Reece Committee
But ultimately people should be aware we are ruled by deception and to question everything. This agenda I speak of has it's fingers in many pies; even the "alternative", current New Age authors. I am thinking specifically of James Lovelock, who is nothing more than new age charlatans in my opinion. This idea that the world in a living organism called "Gaia", I’ll admit, sounds really appealing. It's almost like, how can this chap be a threat? Well in reality he's not. But it's more the mindset that it promotes, which goes hand in hand with the "sustainability" and "greening" agenda heavily promoted by the U.N, (which is essentially wolves in sheep’s clothing). This involved reducing the world population and bringing down the standard of living in the so-called "developed world". But the new world order needs its new religion for the next generations. Debating the impact of this often doesn't take into account the education system that is already in place in our schools, (i.e. they have it planned out, well in advance) thanks to UNESCO. My 4 year old nephew coming home from school with the question “What does it mean to be a good global citizen?” being a real world example of this. Keep your eyes open for the indoctrination, all I'm saying...
Of course you can keep rationalizing this to yourself, “well that’s a good thing that they (the kids) are aware that the world is bigger than just their city”. One has to look at it from a point of view children are easily influenced, and this is a deliberate attempt to not only change their perspective on the world, but to lay blame upon their parents for the state of the world. Especially if an idea is presented to them in the best possible light, and couple that with the encouragement to get their children to see how much (or little) their parents currently recycle. All for the purpose of saving the environment, obviously. But it’s a similar technique which has been used for generations in order to cut out vital knowledge of “how things were” and facts or opinions about history – not just the official party line. This is why generations are divided - they are easier to manipulate if they have no real historical grounding.
Who in their right mind doesn’t want clean air and clean water? It really is the dream scenario for change. Some of the literature put out by the British government about sustainability and the green-economy make it state openly that they are well aware that it is business as usual as far as they are concerned, and those who smell which way the wind is blowing (i.e. opportunists) will tow the party line. That’s why you see all the so called green energy companies, the private business’s cashing in on middle class guilt to turn your house “Carbon Free”, which is pretty inconvenient considering it’s the main gas human beings breathe out. This list is endless.
Yet if you fail to step outside the simple “pro or anti” paradigms we’re offered when trying to understand these issues, you run the risk of being branded a “Global Warming Denier”. Lovely use of Neuro-linguistic Programming (i.e. getting you to accept an idea or theory without much questioning) – you wouldn’t possibly associate the word “Denier” (albeit subconsciously), with those that are labeled “Holocaust Denier”, would you?
This is the new soviet system.
- Aldous Huxley
There’s no need for conspiracy theories when their own writings and words speak volumes. Yet most "lefties" are conditioned to think that they are kicking against the system, not realizing than we're actually moving into a feudal type capitalist system, which has been blended with the communist system of strong governance. They call it commutarianism, the 3rd way (the whole public-private partnership in the U.K being a good example of this.)
Global warming or climate change are some of their primary techniques of changing society - decided on thanks to the Club of Rome, who were given the specific task of dreaming up a scenario which could be used to unite the world.
"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill ... All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."
- Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution, consultants to the UN
CoR are an off shoot off, a specific arm of the One World Government, agenda. Well connected with all the usual “conspiracy” buzzwords like the Bilderburgs, Council of Foreign Relations, etc. And yes, it is an agenda. I think the whole branding of "conspiracy theory" is a kin to the communists who called everything "bourgeoisie" when it didn't fit their agenda. Or the right wing who branded everything under the sun "communist" while failing to realize that the big (tax except) foundations in Amerika were funding what appeared to be left-wing groups - in order to lay the ground work to merge the U.S with the Soviet system ('rule by council'). Please check out the Reece Committee.
Here is an interview 1982 by G. Edward Griffin regarding the time he spent as the head researcher for the Reece Committee
But ultimately people should be aware we are ruled by deception and to question everything. This agenda I speak of has it's fingers in many pies; even the "alternative", current New Age authors. I am thinking specifically of James Lovelock, who is nothing more than new age charlatans in my opinion. This idea that the world in a living organism called "Gaia", I’ll admit, sounds really appealing. It's almost like, how can this chap be a threat? Well in reality he's not. But it's more the mindset that it promotes, which goes hand in hand with the "sustainability" and "greening" agenda heavily promoted by the U.N, (which is essentially wolves in sheep’s clothing). This involved reducing the world population and bringing down the standard of living in the so-called "developed world". But the new world order needs its new religion for the next generations. Debating the impact of this often doesn't take into account the education system that is already in place in our schools, (i.e. they have it planned out, well in advance) thanks to UNESCO. My 4 year old nephew coming home from school with the question “What does it mean to be a good global citizen?” being a real world example of this. Keep your eyes open for the indoctrination, all I'm saying...
Of course you can keep rationalizing this to yourself, “well that’s a good thing that they (the kids) are aware that the world is bigger than just their city”. One has to look at it from a point of view children are easily influenced, and this is a deliberate attempt to not only change their perspective on the world, but to lay blame upon their parents for the state of the world. Especially if an idea is presented to them in the best possible light, and couple that with the encouragement to get their children to see how much (or little) their parents currently recycle. All for the purpose of saving the environment, obviously. But it’s a similar technique which has been used for generations in order to cut out vital knowledge of “how things were” and facts or opinions about history – not just the official party line. This is why generations are divided - they are easier to manipulate if they have no real historical grounding.
Who in their right mind doesn’t want clean air and clean water? It really is the dream scenario for change. Some of the literature put out by the British government about sustainability and the green-economy make it state openly that they are well aware that it is business as usual as far as they are concerned, and those who smell which way the wind is blowing (i.e. opportunists) will tow the party line. That’s why you see all the so called green energy companies, the private business’s cashing in on middle class guilt to turn your house “Carbon Free”, which is pretty inconvenient considering it’s the main gas human beings breathe out. This list is endless.
Yet if you fail to step outside the simple “pro or anti” paradigms we’re offered when trying to understand these issues, you run the risk of being branded a “Global Warming Denier”. Lovely use of Neuro-linguistic Programming (i.e. getting you to accept an idea or theory without much questioning) – you wouldn’t possibly associate the word “Denier” (albeit subconsciously), with those that are labeled “Holocaust Denier”, would you?
This is the new soviet system.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
